Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 15:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

April 20, 2024[edit]

April 19, 2024[edit]

April 18, 2024[edit]

April 17, 2024[edit]

April 16, 2024[edit]

April 15, 2024[edit]

April 14, 2024[edit]

April 13, 2024[edit]

April 12, 2024[edit]

April 11, 2024[edit]

April 10, 2024[edit]

April 9, 2024[edit]

April 8, 2024[edit]

April 7, 2024[edit]

April 5, 2024[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".



File:St_Christopher_church_in_Ampiac_(5).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Portal of the Saint Christopher church in Ampiac, commune of Druelle Balsac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support A bit dark overall but ok --Poco a poco 06:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. The "restless" shadows bother me a lot. Please discuss whether the photo is still a quality image. -- Spurzem 17:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't have a problem with those shadows. --Sebring12Hrs 09:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Milseburg 07:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Towers_from_43rd_floor_of_Mori_Tower.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A view from the cafeteria on the 43rd floor of Mori Tower, looking toward Roppongi Hills Residence B and C. --Grendelkhan 05:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    perspective distortion, correction is needed --F. Riedelio 07:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
    At this angle , i don't think perspective correction makes sense . --Grendelkhan 08:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
     Comment Please do not send anything to CR without a vote. Reset to "Nomination". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
     Question What does "CR" mean? --F. Riedelio 07:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
     Info CR means consensual review --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    Does "CR" refer to the discussion? --F. Riedelio 09:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
     Info I referred to the fact that there hadn't been a valid reason to send this image to CR by turning "/Nomination" to "/Discuss" because there was no vote. Commons:Quality images candidates clearly states this:
    "Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page" --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose However, I do not want to start an edit war over this. So I oppose this image, even though it looks interesting; the distorted perspective by the wide-angle close-up view of the highrises is a bit too much IMO. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 07:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Seattle_in_April_2024_-_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination University Village, Seattle --Another Believer 02:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 18:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Seattle_in_April_2024_-_05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Shake Shack, University Village, Seattle --Another Believer 02:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 18:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

File:3_Lipuväljak_tn,_Otepää.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Street in Otepää, Estonia --Shabashewitz 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Good but needs perspective correction. --Plozessor 03:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) - The second vote from the same user --LexKurochkin 08:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 22:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor and Sebring12Hrs --LexKurochkin 08:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LexKurochkin 08:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

File:52_Miera_St,_Riga.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wooden building in Riga, Latvia --Shabashewitz 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 22:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs, the image needs perspective correction. The other problem is an obstacle overlapping subject in the center of image. --LexKurochkin 08:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per LexKurochkin, perspective, disturbing objects in foreground, and the actual subject (the "wooden building") is just a small part of the picture with correspondingly low detail. --Plozessor 04:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LexKurochkin 08:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Boronti_Lake.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Baranti Lake --Rangan Datta Wiki 08:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Go both, lake and cycler. --PetarM 09:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA and dust spot should be removed. --Ermell 10:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell. Looks also tilted 1°CW to me. --Milseburg 07:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 07:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Paris_14e_-_Cimetière_du_Montparnasse_-_Division_3_-_Tombe_de_Marie-Jacques-Saint-Ange_Mallat_de_Bassilan_-_Statue_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Statue on a grave --Romainbehar 06:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    See COM:FOP#Summary_table; is this statue old enough to be PD? --Grendelkhan 03:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
     Support Dead in 1897, I think it's ok. --Sebring12Hrs 14:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose That's when the person in the grave died, but that's not necessarily when the sculptor died, and if we're making assumptions about anonymous or unattributed works from then, those assumptions should be in the licensing section. Until that's fixed, this doesn't pass guideline #1. @Romainbehar: please fix. Grendelkhan 08:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 Comment see Category:Pierre Granet. --Smial 12:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 Comment I don't understand the relevance; please explain. Grendelkhan 08:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 Info Pierre Granet died in 1910. --LexKurochkin 08:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 Question Is he the sculptor? It's not mentioned anywhere on the image page. Grendelkhan 01:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Yann 20:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I do not see any problem here --LexKurochkin 08:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LexKurochkin 08:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Knysna_(ZA),_Knysna_River,_Ufer_--_2024_--_2427.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Banks of the Knysna River, Knysna, Western Cape, South Africa --XRay 03:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the picture is blurred --Bgag 13:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is blurred. Charlesjsharp 07:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support some very small remains of CA, and somewhat soft, but good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 12:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Just sharpness, structure and CAs improved a little bit. --XRay 14:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. Yann 13:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Nice composition, but sorry, per others.--Alexander-93 21:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Yann. --SHB2000 21:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others, blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp. Sorry --LexKurochkin 08:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I've to agree, it lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 08:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Decline?   --LexKurochkin 08:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)